Simultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering
Key finding. Under abrupt quadrupled carbon dioxide, an appropriate combination of stratospheric sulfate aerosol increase and cirrus cloud thinning restores global mean — and land mean — temperature and precipitation simultaneously to preindustrial levels, though it does not markedly improve regional agreement with the preindustrial climate over aerosol alone.
What question did this research address?
Solar geoengineering faces a well-known trade-off: reduce sunlight enough to cancel the warming from carbon dioxide and you overshoot on rainfall, leaving the world drier than it started, because carbon dioxide and sunlight act on the hydrological cycle differently.
This paper asked whether combining two schemes that act on opposite ends of the spectrum could hit both targets at once — blocking shortwave radiation coming in, and letting longwave radiation out.
What did we find?
The two levers act on different radiation. Stratospheric aerosol deflects incoming sunlight; thinning cirrus cloud, simulated by increasing the fall speed of ice particles, lets more longwave radiation escape to space.
Because they load the energy budget differently, mixing them in the right proportion satisfies two constraints at once rather than trading one against the other.
Both the global mean and the land mean can be restored, which matters because land is where the precipitation change is felt.
The result is explicitly bounded. Compared with aerosol alone, the cocktail does not markedly improve how closely the geoengineered climate resembles the preindustrial one at regional scales — the global means match while the map still does not.
The authors suggest a spatially non-uniform mixture might do better regionally, and leave that open.
Why does it matter?
It shows the temperature-precipitation trade-off is not fundamental to solar geoengineering, only to doing it with one lever. Two independent instruments can meet two targets, which is a basic result in control rather than in climate.
The honest limitation is the important part. Restoring two global numbers is not restoring the climate, and the regional pattern — where anyone actually lives — is largely unimproved.
It also makes cirrus cloud thinning worth taking seriously as a complement rather than a competitor to aerosol schemes, since its value here comes precisely from acting on a different part of the spectrum.
Citation
Long Cao, Lei Duan, Govindasamy Bala, and Ken Caldeira (2017). Simultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters 44, 7429-7437.
Related
- Could reflecting sunlight substitute for reducing carbon dioxide?
- Comparison of the fast and slow climate response to three radiation management geoengineering schemes (Duan et al., 2018)
- Geoengineering as an optimization problem (Ban-Weiss and Caldeira, 2010)
- Why is there a short-term increase in global precipitation in response to diminished CO2 forcing? (Cao et al., 2011)